You are here

Distribution of erm(F) and tet(Q) genes in 4 oral bacterial species and genotypic variation between resistant and susceptible isolates.

TitleDistribution of erm(F) and tet(Q) genes in 4 oral bacterial species and genotypic variation between resistant and susceptible isolates.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2002
AuthorsChung, WO, Gabany, J, G Persson, R, Roberts, MC
JournalJ Clin Periodontol
Volume29
Issue2
Pagination152-8
Date Published2002 Feb
ISSN0303-6979
KeywordsAdhesins, Bacterial, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Proteins, Bacteroides, Chromosome Mapping, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Erythromycin, Genetic Variation, Genotype, Gingivitis, Humans, Methyltransferases, Periodontitis, Phenotype, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella, Prevotella intermedia, Tetracycline Resistance, Transcription Factors
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia are Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria that are currently considered potential periopathogens. Prevotella nigrescens has recently been separated from P. intermedia and its rôle in periodontitis is unknown. The erm(F) gene codes for an rRNA methylase, conferring resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLSB), and the tet(Q) gene for a ribosomal protection protein, conferring resistance to tetracycline. The presence of these resistance genes could impair the use of antibiotics for therapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the carriage of erm(F) and tet(Q), and genetic variability of 12 Porphyromonas gingivalis, 10 Prevotella intermedia, 25 Prevotella nigrescens and 17 Bacteroides forsythus isolates from 9 different patient samples.

METHODS: We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting antibiotic resistance genes, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for detecting genetic variability among the isolates.

RESULTS: Thirty-one (48%) isolates were resistant to both erythromycin and tetracycline and carried the erm(F) and tet(Q) genes, eight (13%) were tetracycline resistant and carried the tet(Q) gene, 9 (14%) were erythromycin resistant and carried the erm(F) gene, and 12 (19%) isolates did not carry antibiotic resistance genes. PFGE was used to compare isolates from the same patient and isolates from different patient samples digested with XbaI. No association was found between antibiotic resistance gene carriage and PFGE patterns in any species examined. All isolates of the same species from the same patient had highly related or identical PFGE patterns. Isolates of same species from different patients had unique PFGE pattern for each species tested.

CONCLUSION: All isolates of the same species from any one patient were genetically related to each other but distinct from isolates from other patients, and 66% of the patients carried antibiotic resistant isolates, which could impair antibiotic therapy.

Alternate JournalJ. Clin. Periodontol.
PubMed ID11895543
Grant ListDE-10913 / DE / NIDCR NIH HHS / United States
P30 DE09743 / DE / NIDCR NIH HHS / United States